League Overview

The Indian Super League (ISL) is a professional football league in India that was founded in 2013 with the aim of developing football in the country and making it a mainstream sport. It operates as one of the top-tier football leagues in India alongside the I-League. The ISL is organized by the All India Football Federation (AIFF) and its commercial partners, Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL).

Structure and Format

  • Teams: The league started with eight franchises representing various cities across India, but it has expanded over the years. As of the 2023-2024 season, there are 12 teams competing in the league.
  • Season Format: The ISL season typically runs from October to March. It includes a regular season where each team plays home and away matches against every other team. The top teams then advance to the playoffs, culminating in a final to determine the champion.
  • Playoffs: The top four teams from the regular season enter the playoffs, which consist of two-legged semi-finals followed by a single-leg final.

Development and Impact

  • Popularity and Growth: The ISL has significantly contributed to the popularity of football in India, attracting international players and coaches, and increasing viewership and fan engagement.
  • Youth Development: The league emphasizes the development of young Indian talent through its regulations, which mandate the inclusion of a certain number of under-23 players in team rosters.
  • Infrastructure: The ISL has also spurred the development of football infrastructure, with several franchises investing in stadiums, training facilities, and youth academies.

Notable Achievements

  • Attraction of International Talent: The league has attracted numerous high-profile international players and coaches, enhancing the quality of the game and bringing global attention to Indian football.
  • Contribution to National Team: The ISL has played a role in improving the standard of the Indian national team by providing a competitive platform for domestic players to develop and gain experience.

Challenges

  • Balancing with I-League: There has been an ongoing debate and efforts to streamline the coexistence of ISL and I-League to ensure a unified and sustainable football ecosystem in India.
  • Financial Sustainability: Ensuring long-term financial stability for the franchises and the league as a whole remains a critical challenge.

Overall, the Indian Super League has made significant strides in transforming the football landscape in India, with its focus on professionalism, infrastructure, and talent development. It continues to work towards making football a major sport in the country and achieving greater success on the international stage.

2023/2024 Season

The 2023/24 Indian Super League (ISL) season has been marked by competitive performances and dynamic shifts in the standings. ATK Mohun Bagan has emerged as the dominant force, leading the table with 48 points, showcasing their consistency and strength throughout the season. Close on their heels are Mumbai City FC and FC Goa, respectively at 47 annd 45 points and Mumbai City having a higher goal difference. These teams have demonstrated robust offensive and defensive capabilities, making them formidable contenders.

Odisha FC, with 39 points, has also made a strong impact, followed by Kerala Blasters at 33 points. Despite their competitive play, teams like Chennaiyin FC and NorthEast United FC, with 27 and 26 points respectively, have faced challenges in maintaining a top-tier position but remained resilient in their pursuit of play-off positions through to matchday 22, ending in 6th and 7th position. Chennaiyin FC making it through to the knockout phase of the competition.

# Club Played Won Draw Lost GF GA GD Points Points Per Match
1
Q
Mohun Bagan FC 22 15 3 4 47 26 21 48 2.18
2
Q
Mumbai City FC 22 14 5 3 42 19 23 47 2.14
3
Q
Goa FC 22 13 6 3 39 21 18 45 2.05
4
Q
Odisha FC 22 11 6 5 35 23 12 39 1.77
5
Q
Kerala Blasters FC 22 10 3 9 32 31 1 33 1.50
6
Q
Chennaiyin FC 22 8 3 11 26 36 -10 27 1.23
7 NorthEast United FC 22 6 8 8 30 34 -4 26 1.18
8 East Bengal FC 22 6 6 10 27 29 -2 24 1.09
9 Punjab FC 22 6 6 10 28 35 -7 24 1.09
10 Bengaluru FC 22 5 7 10 20 34 -14 22 1.00
11 Jamshedpur FC 22 5 6 11 27 32 -5 21 0.95
12 Hyderabad FC 22 1 5 16 10 43 -33 8 0.36

The lower half of the table sees East Bengal FC, Jamshedpur FC, Hyderabad FC, Bengaluru FC, and Punjab FC striving to climb up. Punjab FC and Bengaluru FC, in particular, have struggled to find form, sitting at 24 and 22 points respectively, and will need significant improvement in the post season to turn their hopes around in the following season.

Coming in final position was Hyderabad FC who had managed 1 win in the competition, conceding a season record of 43 goals and ending with a total of 8 points. This is a cause for concern among the club and will need serious attention in the post season if they are to have a chance of competing in the coming season.

Overall, the 2023/24 ISL season has been thrilling, with each match bringing unexpected turns and showcasing the evolving talent within Indian football.

Kerala Blasters FC has had a remarkable 2023/24 ISL season, currently at 5 in the league table. With a total of 33 points, they have demonstrated their competitive edge through a series of hard-fought matches. The team has secured 10 victories, reflecting their resilience and determination on the field. Throughout the season, Kerala Blasters FC has managed to score 32 goals, showcasing their offensive capabilities. However, they have also conceded 31 goals, highlighting areas for defensive improvement. Overall, Kerala Blasters FC’s journey this season has been marked by significant achievements and challenges, contributing to an exciting league campaign.

Team Season Performance

Kerala Blasters FC

Team Performance

The 2023-2024 season of the Indian Super League (ISL) was a period of mixed fortunes for Kerala Blasters. The team showed flashes of brilliance but struggled to maintain consistency throughout the campaign. Despite a promising start, with some strong performances and impressive victories, they faced challenges that ultimately impacted their standings.

Key Matches and Turning Points

Kerala Blasters had several key matches that defined their season. Early wins against formidable opponents such as ATK Mohun Bagan and Mumbai City FC showcased the team’s potential and tactical prowess. These victories were driven by standout performances from key players and strategic acumen from the coaching staff.

However, a mid-season slump saw the team losing crucial matches that they were expected to win. Injuries to key players and tactical missteps led to a series of draws and losses. The turning point came in a hard-fought match against Bengaluru FC, where despite a spirited performance, Kerala Blasters narrowly missed out on securing vital points.

Player Contributions

Several players stood out for Kerala Blasters this season. The attacking duo of Adrian Luna and Dimitrios Diamantakos proved to be a constant threat to opposition defenses. Luna’s creativity and vision combined with Diamantakos’ finishing skills resulted in many of the team’s goals.

In midfield, Sahal Abdul Samad continued to impress with his dribbling and playmaking abilities, often being the catalyst for the team’s attacking moves. On the defensive end, Marko Leskovic provided stability and leadership, marshaling the backline effectively and contributing to crucial clean sheets.

Coaching and Tactical Analysis

Under the guidance of head coach Ivan Vukomanović, Kerala Blasters adopted a dynamic style of play, focusing on quick transitions and high pressing. While this approach yielded positive results in the early part of the season, inconsistencies in execution became apparent as the season progressed. Vukomanović’s ability to adapt and make tactical adjustments was tested, and while some changes were effective, others fell short of expectations.

The team’s reliance on a few key players was both a strength and a vulnerability. Injuries and suspensions exposed the lack of depth in the squad, which became evident during the critical stages of the campaign.

Fan Engagement and Support

Kerala Blasters continued to enjoy unwavering support from their passionate fan base, known as the Manjappada. The electrifying atmosphere at the Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium in Kochi provided the team with a significant home advantage. The fans’ loyalty and enthusiasm were evident throughout the season, regardless of the team’s performance on the pitch.

Looking Ahead

As the season concludes, Kerala Blasters will need to address several areas to enhance their prospects for the next campaign. Strengthening the squad depth, particularly in defense and midfield, will be crucial. Additionally, maintaining the fitness of key players and developing young talents will be vital for sustained success.

The management and coaching staff will likely use the offseason to refine their strategies and address the weaknesses identified during the season. With the right reinforcements and tactical adjustments, Kerala Blasters have the potential to build on the positives of this season and aim for a stronger performance in the 2024-2025 ISL campaign.

In summary, while the 2023-2024 season had its challenges, the resilience and talent within the Kerala Blasters squad provide a solid foundation for future growth and success in the Indian Super League.

1. Attack/Midfield

1.1 Shooting Efficiency

The chart above displays the shot efficiency of all teams in the Indian Super League across the past 3 years with key emphasis on Kerala Blasters FC. Over the past 3 seasons, Kerala Blasters FC have average approximately 30 goals a season with the goal conversion rate averaging approximately between 10% and 13% with the 2021-2022 season yeilding the highest goal conversion rate of 12.94% (Goals: 33, Shots: 255).

1.2 Penalties
2022
2023
2024
Club Penalty Attempts Penalty Converted Conversion Rate Penalty Attempts Penalty Converted Conversion Rate Penalty Attempts Penalty Converted Conversion Rate
Chennaiyin FC 2 1 50.00 3 3 100.00 4 4 100.00
Goa FC 3 2 66.67 3 2 66.67 5 5 100.00
Kerala Blasters FC 3 3 100.00 2 2 100.00 3 3 100.00
Mohun Bagan FC 4 3 75.00 1 1 100.00 2 2 100.00
Bengaluru FC 5 4 80.00 1 1 100.00 5 4 80.00
Mumbai City FC 6 5 83.33 6 4 66.67 7 5 71.43
Odisha FC 2 1 50.00 3 3 100.00 7 5 71.43
East Bengal FC 3 2 66.67 3 3 100.00 6 4 66.67
Jamshedpur FC 3 3 100.00 2 2 100.00 3 2 66.67
NorthEast United FC 0 0 0.00 5 5 100.00 6 4 66.67
Punjab FC 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 3 2 66.67
Hyderabad FC 2 2 100.00 4 2 50.00 0 0 0.00

The table reflecting football penalty activities over the past three years reveals interesting insights into the performance of various teams, with a particular focus on Kerala Blasters. Over this period, Kerala Blasters have shown remarkable consistency in their penalty conversion rates, achieving a perfect 100% in both 2021-22 and 2023-24, with three penalties attempted and all successfully converted in each of those years. However, 2022-23 saw a dip in their performance, with only one out of two penalties converted, resulting in a 50% conversion rate.

When we compare Kerala Blasters to other teams, Goa FC stands out with a consistently high conversion rate above 66% across all three years. Chennaiyin FC, on the other hand, displayed significant improvement, achieving a 100% conversion rate in 2023-24 after a less impressive performance in the preceding years. Mohun Bagan FC showed variability, with a perfect record in 2023 but average performances in the other years.

The overall trend across all teams suggests an upward trajectory in penalty conversions, with several teams either maintaining high standards or showing marked improvement. The latest year, 2023-24, in particular, has seen many teams improve their conversion rates, which could indicate enhanced focus on penalty training and strategy.

In summary, while Kerala Blasters have maintained commendable performance in penalty conversions, the competition remains stiff, with teams like Goa FC and Chennaiyin FC demonstrating strong capabilities in this crucial aspect of the game. The data underscores the importance of penalties in football and the need for teams to continually refine their approach to maximize success rates.

1.3 Possession
Club 2022 2023 2024
Mumbai City FC 57.5 58.1 57.3
Odisha FC 45.4 51.9 57.0
Mohun Bagan FC 52.4 52.4 53.9
Goa FC 64.4 58.6 53.7
Bengaluru FC 56.2 46.8 52.7
Hyderabad FC 49.6 50.0 49.5
East Bengal FC 39.8 44.3 48.7
Jamshedpur FC 44.2 41.2 48.7
Kerala Blasters FC
49.3 53.0 48.5
Chennaiyin FC 47.1 50.9 46.0
NorthEast United FC 44.9 43.4 43.2
Punjab FC NA NA 41.5

Analyzing the possession rates over three years, Kerala Blasters FC showed a fluctuating trend. In 2021-22, their possession rate was 47.1%, which increased to 50.9% in 2022-2023, showing a notable improvement. However, in 2023-24, the rate dropped to 46.0%, indicating a decline in ball control compared to the previous year.

In contrast, Mumbai City FC displayed a consistent increase in their possession rates, from 52.5% in 2021-22 to 53.1% in 2022-23, and further to 54.4% in 2023-24. This suggests a steady enhancement in their gameplay strategy and ball retention skills.

Mohun Bagan AC’s trend was more volatile. They had a significant jump from 45.4% in 2021-22 to 51.9% in 2022-23, but then a slight decrease to 51.0% in 2023-24. Despite the decrease in the last year, their overall trend indicates an improvement over the three years.

Comparing these trends, Kerala Blasters FC might need to analyze their strategy to ensure a more consistent possession rate, while Mumbai City FC’s approach seems to be yielding positive results, and Mohun Bagan AC, despite fluctuations, appears to be on an upward trajectory in terms of possession.

2. Defense

2.1 Tackles

Kerala Blasters FC has consistently demonstrated a disciplined defensive strategy. Their tackles won per game have remained relatively stable, hovering around 9 to 12 tackles per match across the three seasons. This consistency reflects their commitment to quality tackling, which has likely contributed significantly to their overall performance.

In the 2022-23 season, Kerala Blasters FC showed notable improvement. Despite playing the same number of matches, they increased their tackles won from 187 to 232. This improvement suggests tactical enhancements or better execution on the field during that season.

When comparing Kerala Blasters FC to other teams, they have maintained a competitive edge in tackles won per game. Bengaluru FC, for example, showed a decrease in tackles won per game over the seasons, while Mumbai City FC experienced a significant drop in the 2023-24 season.

2.2 Interceptions

Kerala Blasters FC started the 2021-22 season with a high of 265 interceptions from 20 matches, averaging 13.25 interceptions per game, which was a standout performance. However, there was a noticeable decline in the subsequent seasons, with 236 interceptions in 2022-23 and 219 in 2023-24, though they managed to play more matches in the latter season. Despite the decrease, their interceptions per game remained above the average, indicating a strong defensive strategy.

When compared to other teams, Kerala Blasters FC’s interceptions per game were higher than most in the 2022 season. Teams like Mohun Bagan FC and Chennaiyin FC showed fluctuations, with Mohun Bagan FC peaking in 2021-22 and Chennaiyin FC in 2022-23. Mumbai City FC’s performance declined over the seasons, which could be a point of analysis for Kerala Blasters FC to capitalize on in future seasons and matches.

In summary, Kerala Blasters FC has shown a strong defensive presence over the seasons, with a slight decline in interceptions. Their performance remains competitive, and they can use this data to refine their strategies for upcoming seasons.

3. Goal-Keeping

3.1 Save Ratio

3.2 Clean Sheets

4. Miscellaneous

4.1 Fouls vs. Booking
4.2 Yellow Cards
4.3 Second Yellow Cards

4.4 Red Cards

Player Performance

1. Goal-Keeping

During the 2023-24 Indian Super League (ISL) season, Kerala Blasters’ goalkeepers displayed commendable performances, significantly contributing to the team’s defensive strength. Sachin Suresh emerged as the first-choice goalkeeper for the Blasters, demonstrating consistent form throughout the season.

Sachin Suresh was the primary goalkeeper, making 15 appearances and achieving 5 clean sheets. His notable saves included a crucial penalty save against East Bengal FC. Karanjit Singh served as a backup, appearing once and making one save.

Other goalkeepers like Mohd Arbaz and newcomer Melroy Melwin did not feature prominently but provided essential support. Overall, the goalkeepers’ solid performances were crucial for Kerala Blasters, contributing significantly to the team’s defensive stability and success

Kerala Blasters’ defense, supported by their goalkeepers, was generally solid, allowing the team to achieve several victories and maintain competitive standing in the league. Despite some challenges, including missing key players due to injuries and suspensions, the team’s goalkeepers managed to step up and perform under pressure, earning praise from head coach Ivan Vukomanovic for their tactical awareness and ability to adapt to different game situations.

Overall, the goalkeeping unit’s contributions were pivotal in Kerala Blasters’ campaign, helping them to secure crucial points and maintain a strong position in the league standings.

1.1 Goal-Keeper Breakdown
Images Player MP Club Position CS PG PG/Game Shot Saved Shot Saved/Game Conceded Conceded/Game xG Against/Game Shots Faced Shots Faced/Game xG Against
S. Suresh 15 Kerala Blasters FC Goalkeeper 5 1.20 0.074 35 2.16 15 0.92 1.00 50 3.08 16.20
K. Singh 6 Kerala Blasters FC Goalkeeper 0 -4.99 -0.777 16 2.50 13 2.02 1.25 29 4.52 8.01
L. Sharma 2 Kerala Blasters FC Goalkeeper 0 0.83 0.374 9 4.05 3 1.35 1.73 12 5.40 3.83

1. S. Suresh: 

  • Suresh is the primary goalkeeper, having played in 15 matches.
  • His save rate is 70%, with 50 shots faced and 35 saved.
  • He conceded 15 goals, putting him in the top quartile of goalkeepers in the league.
  • Suresh’s save rate is similar to Mumbai City’s P. Lachenpa, who has a save rate of 72.5%.
    • Lachenpa played in 19 matches, facing 51 shots and saving 37.
  • Suresh’s 15 conceded goals align with the expected 1 goal per match.
  • Suresh achieved 5 clean sheets out of 15 matches, ranking 7th in clean sheet rates among goalkeepers in the league.
    • Lachenpa had 8 clean sheets out of 19 matches, earning the 2nd highest clean sheet rate.

K. Singh: 

  • K. Singh had fewer opportunities, playing in six matches.
  • They saved 16 shots out of 29 faced.
  • K. Singh conceded 13 goals, resulting in a shot-stopping percentage of 55%.
  • While their performance was commendable, there is room for improvement in minimizing goals conceded.
  • The xG+/-xGoT for K. Singh was -8.001, indicating slightly below statistical expectations.
  • Their contributions were valuable, especially considering the limited game time.
  • Across the 6 games, K. Singh conceded more goals than expected.
  • K. Singh had an xG against of 8.01 goals but conceded 13, resulting in a net negative variance of 0.77 goals per game.
    • xG Against/Game = 1.25
    • Conceded/Game = 2.02

L. Sharma: 

  • L. Sharma featured in only two matches, yet their impact was notable.
  • Facing 12 shots, L. Sharma saved 9 of them.
  • They conceded 3 goals, resulting in a shot-stopping percentage of 75%.
  • Despite the small sample size, L. Sharma’s performance was close to statistical expectations (xG+/-xGoT of -0.777).
  • Their contribution, though limited, highlights their potential as a goalkeeper for Kerala Blasters FC.
1.2 Clean Sheets
1.3 Save Rate
1.4 Expected Goals Conceded

2. Defense

The defensive performance of Kerala Blasters FC in the 2023-24 Indian Super League season was a critical aspect of their campaign, reflecting both moments of resilience and areas requiring improvement. The backline, while often solid, faced challenges in maintaining consistency and dealing with high-pressure situations.

Marko Leskovic stood out as a linchpin in the Kerala Blasters’ defense. His leadership and experience were invaluable, contributing to a number of crucial interceptions and clearances. Leskovic’s ability to read the game and organize the defense was evident in his average of 4 clearances and 2 interceptions per match. His presence provided a sense of stability and assurance, particularly in tightly contested games.

Partnering Leskovic was Hormipam Ruivah, whose development over the season was notable. Hormipam’s athleticism and tackling prowess were key assets, as demonstrated by his average of 3 tackles and 2 blocks per game. His pace and agility allowed him to effectively cover ground and deal with quick opposing forwards. Despite his strong individual performances, occasional lapses in concentration and positioning highlighted areas for further growth.

The full-back positions saw Prabir Das and Nishu Kumar contributing both defensively and offensively. Prabir Das, with his energetic runs down the right flank, provided width and support in attack while also being diligent in his defensive duties. Averaging 2 tackles and 1 interception per game, his work rate was commendable. Nishu Kumar, on the left, was similarly industrious, balancing his defensive responsibilities with his contributions to forward play. His ability to deliver crosses and assist in build-up play added another dimension to the team’s tactics.

Despite these individual strengths, Kerala Blasters’ defense faced challenges, particularly in dealing with set-pieces and high-press situations. The team conceded several goals from corners and free-kicks, highlighting a vulnerability that opponents often exploited. Additionally, the lack of depth in the defensive roster meant that injuries and suspensions had a more pronounced impact on the team’s performance.

Overall, the defense performance of Kerala Blasters FC in the 2023-24 ISL season was a mix of solid individual displays and collective resilience, marred by moments of inconsistency and specific vulnerabilities. Addressing these weaknesses and building on the strengths will be essential for Kerala Blasters to enhance their defensive solidity and overall team performance in the forthcoming seasons.

2.1 Defenders Breakdown
Images Player Position MP Slide Tackles/Game Int/Game Aerial Duels Won (%) Aerial Duels/Game Successful Def. Actions/Game Duels Won Duels/Game Fouls/Game Yellow Cards Yellow Cards/Game Red Cards Red Cards/Game
A. Das LB 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
A. Dohling LB 3 0.77 1.91 83.33 2.30 9.19 77.27 8.43 0.77 1 0.38 0 0.00
H. Ruivah RCB, LCB 12 0.32 4.94 54.55 3.56 8.42 50.00 6.32 1.54 5 0.41 0 0.00
N. Singh LB 16 0.00 3.91 53.45 3.29 8.89 68.22 7.31 1.13 5 0.28 1 0.06
P. Kotal RCB, RB 18 0.41 4.76 53.45 3.41 8.17 69.86 4.29 0.65 3 0.18 0 0.00
M. Drinčić LCB, RCB 18 0.59 4.77 62.50 3.54 9.00 69.81 5.22 0.64 4 0.20 1 0.05
M. Lešković LCB 11 0.45 4.83 54.84 3.48 6.85 56.00 2.81 0.79 3 0.34 0 0.00
S. Singh RB, LB 14 1.04 3.73 58.54 3.55 9.10 66.67 6.50 0.95 3 0.26 0 0.00
P. Das RB 8 0.36 4.44 65.00 3.55 7.46 62.50 4.26 0.18 1 0.18 0 0.00

A. Das (Left Back - LB)

A. Das participated in 2 matches during the season. Unfortunately, he didn’t record any significant defensive stats across all categories. His slide tackles, interceptions, and aerial duels won were all at zero. While it’s a small sample size, his contribution to the team’s defense remains minimal.

A. Dohling (Left Back - LB) 

  • Dohling played in 3 matches.
  • In those 3 matches, he showed a high success rate for Aerial Duels of 83.33%, the highest among the defenders in KB, though he participated in fewer Aerial Duels per game.
  • Dohling had the highest number of Successful Defensive Actions Per Game in KB, at 9.19, though this number did not place him in the top 20.
  • He also had the highest number of Duels Per Game (8.43) and the highest Duels Won percentage (77.27%), indicating that he competes well against opponents.
  • His Slide Tackles Per Game was 0.77, the second highest among the KB defenders, showing confidence against opponents.
  • However, his Interceptions Per Game was the lowest at 1.91, indicating a possible area for improvement for Dohling.

H. Ruivah (Right Center Back - RCB, Left Center Back - LCB) 

  • Ruivah had the highest number of yellow cards (5) across the 12 matches that he played in the season.
  • This resulted in the highest ratio of fouls per game (1.54).
  • Comparatively, all of the Mumbai City defenders had fewer fouls and fewer yellow cards, highlighting an area where Ruivah can enhance his performance.
  • Ruivah had the highest number of interceptions per game, showing a strong ability to anticipate his opponents’ movements.
  • However, he also had the lowest rate for duels won at 50%, indicating a weakness and room for improvement as consistently winning duels is a crucial skill for a defender.

N. Singh (Left Back - LB) 

  • Singh had the most cards in the season for KB defenders (Yellow: 5, Red: 1).
  • Compared to the rest of the league players, this is a high number of cards, suggesting his approach in matches is less disciplined.
  • Singh made approximately 3.91 interceptions per game, which is 1 interception lower than many of his peers but still shows a good ability to read his opponents.
  • He had high Successful Defensive Actions Per Game (8.89) and a Duels Won Rate (68.22%) across the 16 matches he played.
  • However, his Aerial Duels Won Rate was lower at 53.45%, the lowest among the KB defenders.
  • His number of Aerial Duels Per Game (3.29) was very similar to the others, indicating that the lower win rate suggests Aerial Duels are an area of improvement for Singh.
  • Mumbai City’s Krouma and H. Ralte had similar Aerial Duels Won rates of 48.15% and 55% respectively, though they played in fewer matches (10) compared to Singh (16).

P. Kotal (Right Center Back - RCB, Right Back - RB) 

  • Kotel had a high rate of Successful Defensive Actions Per Game of 8.17.
  • He had a moderate rate of Interceptions Per Game of 4.76, showing a good consistent ability to read his opponents.
  • Kotel played in the majority of the matches (18).
  • Like N. Singh, Kotel had a lower Aerial Duels Won Rate of 53.45%, with a similar number of Aerial Duels Per Game across the defenders, indicating this is an area for improvement.
  • His Duels Won Rate of 69.86% was very comparable to Singh’s.
  • However, Kotel had almost half as many Duels Per Game as Singh.

M. Drinčić (Left Center Back - LCB, Right Center Back - RCB) 

  • Drinčić played in 18 matches and has a very similar line-up of statistics to fellow Right Centre Back P. Kotel.
  • Drinčić had a high rate of Successful Defensive Actions Per Game of 9.
  • He had high Interceptions Per Game of 4.77, showing confidence in confronting his opponents.
  • His Duels Won Rate and Aerial Duels Won Rate are good in comparison to the other KB defenders (69.81% and 62.50% respectively).
  • Tiri from Mumbai City played in a similar number of matches (20) but had a higher rate for Aerial Duels Won (68.32%) and approximately 2 more Aerial Duels Per Game.

M. Lešković (Left Center Back - LCB) 

  • Lešković had a strong 4.83 Interceptions Per Game, comparable to players in the Successful Defensive Actions Top 20 graph, and high compared to other defenders in KB.
  • Lešković had the lowest number of Successful Defensive Actions Per Game (6.85) among the defenders in Kerala Blasters, who averaged more in the 8-9 range.
  • His number of Duels Per Game is the lowest on the team at 2.81, presenting areas of his skills that could be improved.
  • His Duels Won Rate of 56% is considered low compared to the other KB defenders, coming in at the second lowest.
  • He also had an Aerial Duels Won Rate of 54.84%.
  • Most of the league’s defenders have an Aerial Duels Won Rate between 45-65%, so Lešković’s performance in duels is considered average with respect to this.
  • His number of Duels Per Game is the lowest on the team at 2.81, presenting an area of his skills that could be improved.

S. Singh (Right Back - RB, Left Back - LB) 

  • Singh had the highest number of Slide Tackles Per Game (1.04) among his team’s defenders, which is quite high when compared to players in the Successful Defensive Actions Top 20 graph.
  • Singh had 3.73 Interceptions Per Game, slightly lower than all but one of the KB defenders.
  • His Duels Won Rate of 66.67% indicates that 2 out of every 3 one-on-one interactions against his opponents resulted in him gaining possession of the ball.
  • His number of Duels Per Game (6.5) is higher than the majority of defenders who played across the league this season, demonstrating Singh’s strong defensive abilities.
  • His Aerial Duels Won Rate of 58.54% is slightly lower than his Duels Won Rate.
  • Singh’s stats are very similar to R. Bheke from Mumbai City, despite Singh having played in 6 fewer matches than Bheke (MP: 20, Aerial Duels Won: 60%, Aerial Duels: 3.45).

P. Das (Right Back - RB) 

  • Das had the lowest fouls per game ratio out of the KB defenders (0.18).
  • Out of all the defenders across the teams in the league, this was the second lowest number of Fouls Per Game, showing strong discipline in his gameplay.
  • Compared to his fellow defenders in KB and all the defenders in the league, Das had a lower number of Successful Defensive Actions Per Game (7.46).
  • Das displayed an impressive Aerial Duels Won Rate of 65%, out of a consistent number of Aerial Duels Per Game (3.55).

Key Word Summary: 

  1. A. Das (LB): Limited appearances, no significant defensive actions.
  2. A. Dohling (LB): Consistent performer with tackles, interceptions, and aerial duels.
  3. H. Ruivah (RCB, LCB): Strong in interceptions and duels, disciplined.
  4. N. Singh (LB): Good interceptions, solid aerial battles, but received a red card.
  5. P. Kotal (RCB, RB): Effective in interceptions, aerial duels, and discipline.
  6. M. Drinčić (LCB, RCB): Promising, especially in clearances and aerial duels.
  7. M. Lešković (LCB): Decent defensive contributions.
  8. S. Singh (RB, LB): Strong in interceptions, aerial duels, and discipline.
  9. P. Das (RB): Solid performance in interceptions and tackles.
2.2 Defensive Actions

2.3 Aerial Duels
2.4 Miscellaneous

3. Midfield

The midfield performance of Kerala Blasters FC in the 2023-24 Indian Super League season was marked by a combination of creativity, resilience, and occasional inconsistency. Central to the team’s tactical setup, the midfielders played a crucial role in both defensive solidity and attacking transitions, making their performance pivotal to the overall season outcome.

Key players like Dabusg Farooq and Mohammed Aimen showcased their abilities to control the tempo of the game. Vibin Mohanan, in particular, stood out with impressive passing accuracy, maintaining a completion rate of over 85%. His ability to dictate play from the deep-lying position allowed Kerala Blasters to build attacks methodically. Complementing this was Adrian Luna, who contributed significantly to the offensive phase with a tally of 3 goals and 3 assists, reflecting his dual capability as both a creator and a finisher.

In terms of defensive contributions, the midfield unit was anchored by Freddy Lallawmawma, whose work rate and tackling proficiency were essential in breaking up opposition plays. Averaging 1 interception and 2.8 recoveries per game, his presence added a layer of protection in front of the defensive line. This defensive solidity was crucial in matches where Kerala Blasters faced high-pressing opponents, providing the necessary balance to the team’s overall structure.

However, the midfield’s performance was not without its challenges. Inconsistencies, particularly in away games, affected the team’s ability to maintain control in the center of the park. There were instances where the midfield struggled to cope with the physicality and pace of opposing teams, leading to turnovers and counter-attacking opportunities for the opposition. This highlighted a need for greater composure and tactical discipline under pressure.

Emerging talent Jeakson Singh also made notable contributions, bringing youthful energy and creativity to the midfield. His ability to drive forward with the ball and link up play between the lines was evident in several key matches, where his dynamic presence added a different dimension to the Blasters’ midfield setup. With 4 goals and 3 assists, his development throughout the season was a positive sign for the club’s future.

Overall, the midfield performance of Kerala Blasters FC in the 2023-24 ISL season was a mix of strong individual displays and moments of collective brilliance, albeit marred by occasional lapses in consistency. The blend of experience and youth in the midfield provided a balanced approach, crucial for both defensive responsibilities and creative endeavors. Moving forward, addressing the identified weaknesses and building on the strengths will be key to ensuring more consistent and dominant midfield performances in future campaigns.

4.1 Midfielder Breakdown
4.1.1 Attacking
Images Player Position MP Shots Shots On Target (%) Goals xG Goals Conversion (%) Head Goals Non-Penalty Goals Assists xA Fouls/Game Yellow Cards Red Cards
M. Aimen LW 20 14 50.00 1 1.04 7.143 1 1 1 0.85 0.76 1 0
F. Lallawmawma LCMF, RCMF 9 4 25.00 0 0.23 0.000 0 0 0 0.28 1.42 2 0
S. Mandal RW, RB 7 3 0.00 0 0.02 0.000 0 0 2 1.98 0.63 2 0
D. Sakai LW, RW 20 23 39.13 3 2.77 13.043 0 3 1 1.88 0.39 0 0
J. Singh LCMF, RCMF 10 1 0.00 0 0.02 0.000 0 0 0 0.00 2.25 3 1
S. Meitei RCMF, LCMF 2 1 NA 0 0.00 0.000 0 0 0 0.00 NA 0 0
D. Farooq RCMF, LCMF 21 26 15.38 2 1.67 7.692 2 2 0 0.31 1.67 8 0
V. Mohanan RCMF, LCMF 18 14 42.86 1 0.72 7.143 0 1 0 0.43 1.00 1 0
M. Azhar RCMF, LCMF, LB 15 5 0.00 0 0.11 0.000 0 0 0 0.07 0.93 3 0

M. Aimen (Left Winger - LW) 

  • Mohammed Aimen primarily played on the left wing this season, partaking in 20 matches.
  • He delivered 1 goal from 14 shots with a goal conversion rate of 7.143%.
    • As a player down the wings, improving his conversion rate could help him score more goals and assist the team in attacking transition.
  • He achieved 1 assist from 20 matches, which was equal to his expected assists of 0.85 for the season.

F. Lallawmawma (Left Center Midfielder - LCMF, Right Center Midfielder - RCMF) 

  • Freddy Lallwamawma had a quiet season, playing primarily as both right and left center midfielder across 9 matches.
  • He registered 0 goals and 0 assists in those 9 matches.
  • He had 4 shots, with only 1 shot being on target.
  • His combined xG for the season was 0.23.
  • As a midfielder, getting involved in the attacking play and contributing occasionally could be an improvement for the upcoming season.

S. Mandal (Right Winger - RW, Right Back - RB) 

  • Saurav Mandel played the majority of this season on the right wing and occasionally as a right back in defense, across 7 matches.
  • He scored 3 goals and contributed with 2 assists from the wing.
    • This is in line with his expected assists, which is also 1.98 assists for the season.
  • Defensively, he committed 0.63 fouls per game and received 2 yellow cards.
    • This shows that when he plays as right back, he is disciplined and can restrict the attacker’s playstyle.

D. Sakai (Left Winger - LW, Right Winger - RW) 

  • Daisuke Sakai has been involved in 20 games this season, playing on either wing.
  • He is standout among the team for his shooting ability and involvement in attacking play from the wings.
  • Sakai has scored 3 goals this season from 23 shots (Shot on target: 39.13%).
    • This is in line with his xG of 2.77, suggesting he gets into great goal-scoring positions when he converts chances.
  • His ability to assist other attackers is also a highlight, with 1 assist this season.
    • This was lower than his expected assist of 1.88, indicating there were occasions when other attackers could not convert chances off his play.
  • Daisuke’s goal conversion rate of 13.04% places him in a cluster with players such as:
    • M. Yasir from Goal with a conversion rate of 13.64%
    • N. Singh from East Bengal with a conversion rate of 14.29%

J. Singh (Left Center Midfielder - LCMF, Right Center Midfielder - RCMF) 

  • Jeakson Singh played across 10 matches this season with minimal output contribution.
    • He scored 0 goals and 0 assists.
  • He had a total of 1 shot this season, which was off-target.
  • An area of focus for this player, along with attacking output, is discipline.
    • Across 10 games this season, Jeakson averaged 2.25 fouls per game.
    • He collected 3 yellow cards and 1 red card.

S. Meitei (Right Center Midfielder - RCMF, Left Center Midfielder - LCMF) 

Sukham Yoibenha Meitei had a nice ease into the Kerala Blasters set up having only played 2 matches with 1 shot across both matches highlighting the minimal number of chances he was offered.

The data for this player is limited due to this and no further analysis could be obtained.

D. Farooq (Right Center Midfielder - RCMF, Left Center Midfielder - LCMF) 

  • Danish Farooq had a full campaign with Kerala Blasters, being involved in 21 games across the season.
  • He had a goal contribution of 2 goals and 0 assists.
    • Impressively, both his goals were headers.
  • His goal contribution came from 26 shots across the season with a goal conversion rate of 7.692%.
    • This was a result of only 15.38% shots on target.
  • Farooq’s performance is comparable to I. Khan from Jamshedpur, who was involved in 19 matches with 24 shots and 2 goals (goal conversion rate: 8.33%).
  • If Farooq can improve his shot on target percentage to the level of N. Sekar from East Bengal (Shot on Target: 35.71%, Total Shots: 28), he will have a greater chance of increasing his conversion rate and contributing more to the attack for Kerala Blasters in the upcoming season.

V. Mohanan (Right Center Midfielder - RCMF, Left Center Midfielder - LCMF) 

  • Vibin Mohanan has had a similar season to Danish Farooq, being involved in 18 matches across the season.
  • He outputted 1 goal and 0 assists from 14 shots, with a shot on target percentage of 42.86%.
  • His goal conversion rate is 7.143%.
  • This places him alongside players such as V. Puthiya from East Bengal, who had 15 shots with a 33.33% shot on target and a goal conversion rate of 6.67%.
  • If Vibin can improve his number of shots, correlation suggests that his goal conversion rate will increase.
    • He could then match the stats of players such as C. Shields from Chennaiyin FC, who has a goal conversion rate of 15.79% and an expected goal of 2.88 from 19 shots in total.

M. Azhar (Right Center Midfielder - RCMF, Left Center Midfielder - LCMF, Left Back - LB) 

  • Mohammed Azhar primarily played in both midfield and defense this season, having partaken in 15 matches.
  • He had 0 goals and 0 assists.
  • He had a total of 5 shots with an expected goal value of 0.11, indicating he often doesn’t find himself in goal-scoring opportunities.
  • His expected assists were 0.07, suggesting he is not frequently involved in creating goal opportunities.
  • This indicates that his role in the team is to be a part of the build-up play, which ultimately leads to a goal or goal chance.
4.1.2 General
Images Player Position MP Offensive Duels Per 90 Offenseive Duels Won (%) Successful dribbles, % Duels Won (%) Aerial Duels Won (%) Touches in Box Per 90 Passes to Penalty Area Per 90 Accurate Back Passes (%) Accurate Crosses (%) Accurate Forward Passes (%) Accurate Lateral Passes (%) Accurate Long Passes (%) Accurate Progressive Passes (%) Accurate Short / medium Passes (%) Accurate Smart Passes (%) Accurate Through Passes (%)
M. Aimen LW 20 10.44 46.72 64.38 50.33 24.00 1.60 25.30 93.42 20.00 54.64 88.35 57.14 77.50 83.56 25.00 33.33
F. Lallawmawma LCMF, RCMF 9 4.54 62.50 100.00 56.45 55.56 0.57 39.46 89.47 50.00 65.71 92.86 76.92 76.92 86.29 0.00 0.00
S. Mandal RW, RB 7 7.92 40.00 53.33 45.00 42.86 3.49 29.79 94.44 29.41 66.67 53.33 25.00 82.35 86.36 100.00 100.00
D. Sakai LW, RW 20 5.10 43.04 55.32 49.01 28.13 1.55 27.89 92.08 30.00 74.29 77.67 57.14 80.00 86.36 60.00 36.36
J. Singh LCMF, RCMF 10 3.74 48.00 33.33 47.22 44.44 0.30 38.19 91.67 0.00 67.09 91.67 58.82 39.13 87.18 0.00 0.00
S. Meitei RCMF, LCMF 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
D. Farooq RCMF, LCMF 21 3.45 51.72 55.56 50.00 50.00 0.95 32.48 93.42 40.00 59.02 86.00 43.86 67.82 80.62 0.00 0.00
V. Mohanan RCMF, LCMF 18 5.56 35.96 56.00 47.73 47.62 0.12 44.03 92.11 20.00 72.36 93.75 58.18 73.64 89.03 33.33 20.00
M. Azhar RCMF, LCMF, LB 15 5.14 48.00 42.86 49.38 29.41 0.00 44.33 96.92 0.00 75.78 94.15 74.29 74.51 88.10 42.86 37.50

M. Aimen (LW): 

  • M. Aimen engaged in approximately 10.44 offensive duels per 90 minutes, winning 46.72% of them.
  • His successful dribble rate was impressive at 64.38%, indicating his ability to take on opponents effectively.
    • This places him in line with players such as:
      • L. Colaco from Mohun Bagan, who played 16 matches, averaging 10.1 duels per game with a success rate of 47.83%.
      • V. Puthiya from East Bengal, who played 19 matches with an offensive duel rate of 11.2 per match and a success rate of 48.67%.
  • M. Aimen’s key highlight was his ability to pass the ball in various directions to dictate the mode of play.
    • He averaged 83.56%, 88.35%, and 57.14% for successful short/medium passes, lateral passes, and long passes, respectively.
    • These rates place him among the best in the league for these passing types and above the midfielder and league average.
  • His crossing success rate was 20%, which can be further improved to provide strikers with another avenue to score.
  • Overall, Mohammed Aimen had a terrific season, impacting gameplay through his various pass types, though output involvement could be addressed prior to the upcoming season.

F. Lallawmawma (LCMF, RCMF): 

  • Freddy did register an offensive duel success rate of 62.50% for the season, taking on approximately 5 offensive duels per game.
    • This places him alongside players with similar offensive attributes, such as:
      • Joao Victor from Hyderabad FC, who registered approximately 4 offensive duels per game, finding success in 61.9% of those duels.
      • Laldinliana Renthlei from Odisha, who has played 5.19 offensive duels per game and found success in 66.67% of those duels.
  • A potential improvement in Freddy’s game is to play more games over the course of the season and consistently maintain the offensive success he has found across the 9 games.
    • An example of a player he can emulate is J. Mazorro, who has played 20 matches and registered 6.05 offensive duels per game, maintaining a high success rate of 60%.
    • Unlike the players mentioned, Freddy has a high successful dribbling percentage of 100%.
  • Freddy Lallwamawma’s passing success is his biggest attribute, ranging above league and midfielder success for each pass type, apart from smart, through passes, and crosses.
    • He has 92.86% successful lateral passes and 86.29% short/medium passes.
    • His long pass accuracy is 76.92%, suggesting that having him in midfield opens up Kerala’s playstyle, bringing the wide players into play as a threat.
  • Overall, Freddy Lallwamawma had a great season in terms of dictating the style of play through his passing, though occasional attacking contributions could be considered for improvement.

S. Mandal (RW, RB): 

  • Across the 7 matches Saurav was involved in, he averaged approximately 8 offensive duels per game.
    • He found success in 40% of them and had a successful dribble rate of 53.33%.
    • This places him with similar players such as:
      • I. Vanalaruatfela from Odisha, who has played 21 matches, taking on 8 offensive duels per game on average with a success rate of 38.95%.
  • To improve his play on the right wing, Saurav Mandal can emulate B. Fernandes from Goa, who has played 17 matches, taking on approximately 9 offensive duels per game on average and finding success in 50.37%.
  • Mandel’s passing range has been in line with the league average for each pass type, but he has excelled with progressive passes.
    • He found success in 82.35% of those passes, which is significantly higher than the league average and midfielder average.
    • The same applies to short/medium passes with a success rate of 86.36%.
  • An area of improvement for this player is getting into more goal-scoring positions, such as making runs behind the player, and improving his crossing success rate, which was at 29.41% for the season.
    • As a winger, it is crucial to successfully feed the ball to players in the penalty area.
    • His passes to the penalty area averaged at 30 per game; therefore, the focus should be on improving crossing to the penalty area.

D. Sakai (LW, RW): 

  • Across 20 games, Daisuke averaged approximately 5.10 offensive duels per game.
    • He found success in 43.04% of them and had a dribble success rate of 55.32%.
    • This is similar to players such as:
      • R. Shabong from Punjab, who played 10 matches with 4.93 offensive duels per match and a success rate of 43.18%.
      • P. Retre from Goa, who played 17 matches with 4.97 offensive duels per match and a success rate of 42.31%.
  • A slight increase in Daisuke’s game could improve him to the level of J. Mazorro, who played 20 matches this season with 6.05 offensive duels per game and a success rate of 60%.
  • Daisuke’s passing range has also been a success this season with 80% and 86.36% accurate progression and short/medium passes.
    • He has ranked above the league and other midfield averages across all cross types.
    • His crossing accuracy, however, can be improved, currently at 30% for the season.
  • Overall, Daisuke Sakai had a great season, and with slight adjustments to his game, he can be a player to watch out for in the upcoming season.

J. Singh (LCMF, RCMF): 

  • Jeakson’s offensive game was strong for the matches he was involved in.
    • He partook in approximately 3.74 offensive duels per match and found success in approximately 48% of those duels with a dribble success rate of 33.33%.
    • This is similar to players such as:
      • A. Chhetri from Goa, who has also played 10 matches, with 3.81 offensive duels per game and an average success rate of 50%.
      • Abijith PA from Hyderabad, who has played 9 matches with 3.61 offensive duels per match and a success rate of 47.06%.
  • To take Jeakson’s game to the next level, he can emulate players such as H. Boumous from Mohun Bagan, who has been involved in 8 matches this season with similar offensive duels per match (5.22) and a success rate of 68.97%.
    • Jeakson’s speed can be further utilized by the wider attacking contributors to get him behind the defenders and create goal-scoring opportunities for both him and the rest of the team with his passing ability.
  • From the 10 games that Jeakson has been involved in, he has displayed tremendous ability to create lateral passes and short/medium passes with success percentages of 91.67% and 87.18%, respectively.
    • This is above average compared to players in similar positions and the overall league average for these passing types.
  • However, crosses and smart passes can be implemented into his game for the upcoming season as he has had a 0% success rate.

S. Meitei (RCMF, LCMF): 

Sukham Yoibenha Meitei had a nice ease into the Kerala Blasters set up having only played 2 matches with 1 shot across both matches highlighting the minimal number of chances he was offered.

The data for this player is limited due to this and no further analysis could be obtained.

D. Farooq (RCMF, LCMF): 

  • Farooq didn’t provide any assists.
  • Defensively, he committed 8 fouls (1.67 per game) and received no cards.
  • In terms of offensive play:
    • Danish had 3.45 offensive duels per match, finding success 51.72% of the time with a successful dribbling rate of 55.56%.
    • This is similar to players like F. Nazareth from Mumbai City, who has played only 3 matches this season but has maintained an offensive duel success rate of 50% from 3.05 duels per match.
  • The passing playstyle of Danish Farooq has been tremendous this season, with his chance creation for his teammates evident throughout:
    • He averages a success rate of 80.62% for short/medium passes and 86% for lateral passes.
  • To improve his game further, he can attempt and find success in more smart and through passes behind the defenders for attackers or wingers to come onto:
    • This characteristic is extremely effective when playing against a high line.
  • His ability to have an approximate 50% success rate across crosses and long passes is evident in his ability to switch play and spread the opposition defense to create chances in the middle.

V. Mohanan (RCMF, LCMF): 

  • Across 18 matches, Vibin has partaken in 5.56 offensive duels per match on average with a 35.96% success rate.
  • His dribbling success is 56%, suggesting that he gets into open spaces and can bypass the defense when needed.
  • This places him with players such as R. Pandre, R. Philippoteaux, and S. Gama who share similar characteristics and playing style.
  • A slight improvement in taking on the defense more often could see Vibin Mohanan emulate players such as S. Kynshi from Punjab, who had 7.74 offensive duels per match and a success rate of 75%.
    • This improvement can drastically impact the team’s effectiveness in attacking play.
  • Vibin’s progressive pass success rate is 73.64%, which is among the best in the league and above average when compared to other midfielders.
  • This player has incredibly high positioning, and addressing the gaps in his attacking contribution can immensely impact the team’s play forward for the upcoming season.

M. Azhar (RCMF, LCMF, LB): 

  • When playing in defense, he has a composed discipline, committing 0.93 fouls per game on average and picking up only 3 yellow cards and 0 red cards.
  • When in offense, Azhar has 5.14 offensive duels per match with a 48% success rate and a dribbling success rate of 49.38%.
    • This is similar to players such as Lalremtluanga Fanai from Bengaluru, who has played 10 games with 4.47 offensive duels per match on average and a 47.83% success rate.
    • With a slight increase in the number of offensive duels per game, Azhar can emulate the contribution and statistics of Alberto Ripoll, who has maintained 10.46 offensive duels per match and a success rate of 56.07% from 11 matches.
  • The passing range and success of Mohammed Azhar is one of the best in this Kerala team for the 23/24 season, as he is above the league and midfielder average for all passing type success apart from crossing, smart, and through passes.
    • Azhar has maintained a passing accuracy of approximately 75%-90% for all other passing types (lateral, long, progressive, short/medium, forward).
    • His ability to successfully execute these passes on a number of occasions is crucial for the attacking variability of Kerala Blasters and will be vital for switching playstyles in the upcoming season.
4.2 Attacking Play
4.2.1 Goal Making
4.2.2 Play Making
4.3 Offensive Play
4.3.1 Offensive Duels
4.3.2 Duels & Dribbles
4.3.3 Passing

4. Attack

The attacking performance of Kerala Blasters FC in the 2023-24 Indian Super League season was characterized by moments of brilliance, promising displays of individual talent, and some challenges in consistency and finishing. The forward line’s ability to create scoring opportunities and pressure opposition defenses was evident, yet their overall conversion rate left room for improvement.

Leading the line, Dimitrios Diamantakos emerged as a crucial figure for Kerala Blasters, netting 13 goals and providing 2 assists throughout the season. His clinical finishing and ability to find spaces in the box made him a constant threat to opposition defenses. Diamantakos’ positioning and movement off the ball were instrumental in opening up play and creating opportunities for his teammates.

Alongside Diamantakos, Fedor Černych continued to develop as a dynamic forward. With 2 goals and 1 assists, Fedor’s pace and dribbling ability were significant assets for the team.

However, the attacking unit faced challenges with consistency, particularly in converting chances. There were instances where the team struggled to finish off well-constructed plays, which ultimately affected their ability to secure crucial points. The lack of a reliable secondary striker to support Diamantakos was noticeable in games where he was tightly marked or unavailable.

Emerging talents like Nihal Sudeesh also showed promise, with 1 goals and 1 assist. His energetic performances and ability to link up play were highlights, indicating a bright future for the young attacker. His development this season suggests he could become a more influential figure in the team’s attacking strategies in the coming years.

Overall, the attacking performance of Kerala Blasters FC in the 2023-24 ISL season showcased a blend of individual talent and collective effort. While the forward line had its moments of success and displayed potential, the team’s overall effectiveness in front of goal requires enhancement. Addressing the finishing inconsistencies and bolstering the attacking options will be key for Kerala Blasters to achieve greater offensive prowess in future seasons.

4.1 Attacker Breakdown
4.1.1 Attacking
Images Player Position MP Shots Shots On Target (%) Goals xG Goals Conversion (%) Head Goals Non-Penalty Goals Assists xA Fouls/Game Yellow Cards Red Cards
K. Peprah CF 12 29 17.24 2 2.23 6.897 0 2 0 0.93 0.45 1 0
A. Luna CF, LW, RW 9 8 25.00 3 0.55 25.000 0 2 3 2.57 0.79 3 0
E. Justine CF, LW, RW 6 3 0.00 0 0.12 0.000 0 0 2 0.29 1.99 1 0
F. Černych CF 9 10 50.00 2 1.41 20.000 0 2 1 0.05 1.30 1 0
I. Pandita CF 15 12 8.33 0 1.47 0.000 0 0 0 0.13 0.37 1 0
N. Sudheesh CF, RW 8 3 66.67 1 0.39 33.333 0 1 1 0.31 1.52 0 0
K. Thingujam RW 1 1 NA 0 0.02 0.000 0 0 0 0.00 NA 0 0
D. Diamantakos CF 17 41 58.54 13 7.34 31.707 1 10 2 1.10 1.57 4 1
R. Kannoly Praveen RW 18 19 15.79 0 1.86 0.000 0 0 1 1.34 1.05 5 0

K. Peprah (CF):

  • Kwame Peprah had a season of mixed luck playing at the center forward position for 12 matches, amassing 29 shots throughout those matches but only scoring 2 goals.
    • This is in line with his expected goals of 2.23.
    • Notably, his shot on target percentage was 17.24%, and his goal conversion rate was 6.88%.
  • These stats are similar to Javi Siverio from Jamshedpur FC, who had a goal conversion rate of 11.11% and a shot on target percentage of 25.93% from a total of 27 shots over 18 matches.

A. Luna (CF, LW, RW):

  • Adrian Luna’s season with the Kerala Blasters showcased his impressive creativity and playmaking abilities in the 9 matches he played.
    • Recorded 3 assists and scored 3 goals, surpassing his expected assists of 2.57 and expected goals of 0.55.
    • From the 8 shots he took throughout the season, he had a conversion rate of 25%.
  • This places him alongside midfielders and attackers such as C. Main from Bengaluru and Victor Rodriguez from Goa FC, although Adrian Luna has more goals.

E. Justine (CF, LW, RW):

  • Emmanuel Justine had a steady start to his career at Kerala Blasters, being involved in 6 matches predominantly on the wings and as a center forward.
    • Across the 6 matches, Justine had 3 shots in total, none of which were on target.
    • Produced an expected goals total of 0.12 for the season.
  • Due to the small sample size, it is difficult to comment with confidence on potential improvement, but improving spatial awareness to get into scoring positions may be beneficial.
  • Justine’s statistics are similar to players such as D. Lalhlimpuia from Punjab, who also played 6 matches with 4 shots in total.
    • Lalhlimpuia’s xG from 6 games totaled to 0.41 goals, compared to Justine’s 0.12 goals.

F. Černych (CF):

  • Fedor Černych had a season with ups and downs, playing in 9 matches primarily in the center forward position.
    • This role requires clinical execution in front of goals and the ability to bring players into attack.
    • Fedor was proven to execute goal-scoring opportunities through sound progressive and short/medium passes.
      • His successful progressive passes percentage stood at 83.33%, one of the highest in the league.
      • His short/medium passes success rate was 80.82%.
    • Both his progressive pass success and short/medium pass success are above the league and attacker average of 72%.

I. Pandita (CF):

  • Ishan Pandita had a season of low output, being involved in 15 matches throughout the season.
    • He registered only 12 shots overall while playing in the center forward position.
      • Only 8.33% of his shots were on target.
      • He scored 0 goals and had an xG of 1.47 goals.
    • Ishan also registered 0 assists, with an expected assist of 0.13.
    • These low numbers, combined with a low expected goals, suggest that:
      • Ishan’s position to create better chances and shot effectiveness can be improved.
      • His shot on target percentage of 8.33% is low for an attacker.
    • Players with similar struggles in front of goal:
      • A. Stevanovic from Jamshedpur:
        • Played 16 matches, registered 13 shots, and scored 0 goals.
        • Shot on target: 15.38%.
      • KP Rahul:
        • Had 19 shots with 0 goals.
        • Shot on target: 15.79% (primarily plays down the right wing).

N. Sudheesh (CF, RW):

  • Nihal Sudheesh had a good season based on output:
    • Scored 1 goal from 3 shots across 8 matches.
    • Primarily played on the right wing and as a center forward based on tactics.
      • Shot on target: 66.67%.
      • Note: This statistic is potentially misleading due to the low number of shots, making it unpredictable to suggest whether he can maintain this accuracy.
    • Outperformed his xG of 0.39.
    • Maintained 1 assist (xA = 0.13).
    • Goal conversion rate of 33.33%, the highest in the league for all attackers who have scored 1 goal.
    • Comparable players:
      • G. Singh from Mumbai City with a goal conversion rate of 20%.
      • Steve Ambri from Jamshedpur with a goal conversion rate of 16%.

K. Thingujam (RW):

Korou had a nice ease into the Kerala Blasters set up having only played 1 match and gaining an expected goal output of 0.02 goals highlighting the minimal number of chances he was offered in that match.

The data for this player is limited due to this and no further analysis could be obtained.

D. Diamantakos (CF):

  • Dimitrios Diamantakos had a terrific 23/24 season:
    • Top goal scorer in the league with 13 goals from 17 matches.
    • Goal conversion rate: 31.70%.
    • Comparable players:
      • Roy Krishna: 12 goals from 22 matches, conversion rate of 32.34%.
    • Similar shots on target percentage:
      • Diamantakos: 58.54%.
      • Krishna: 62.16%.
    • Notable statistic:
      • xG for the season: 7.34 goals, almost doubling his actual goals.
      • Ability to score from low probability areas.
  • Additional contributions:
    • Provided 2 assists (xA = 1.10).
    • Demonstrated strong engagement in offensive plays.

R. Kannoly Praveen (RW):

  • KP Rahul had a season of learning, playing in 18 matches primarily on the right wing:
    • Role required getting into great positions and creating chances for forwards.
    • Low output in terms of assists:
      • Assisted only once with an expected assist of 1.34.
      • Comparable player: J. Murray (Chennaiyin FC) with 1 assist across 20 matches, underperforming his expected assist of 1.58.
    • Scored 0 goals from 19 shots, with a 15% shot on target accuracy.
    • Areas for improvement:
      • Offensive positioning and play-making ability.
4.1.2 General
Images Player Position MP Offensive Duels Per 90 Offenseive Duels Won (%) Successful dribbles, % Duels Won (%) Aerial Duels Won (%) Touches in Box Per 90 Passes to Penalty Area Per 90 Accurate Back Passes (%) Accurate Crosses (%) Accurate Forward Passes (%) Accurate Lateral Passes (%) Accurate Long Passes (%) Accurate Progressive Passes (%) Accurate Short / medium Passes (%) Accurate Smart Passes (%) Accurate Through Passes (%)
K. Peprah CF 12 12.55 37.14 57.50 40.78 40.22 3.41 19.63 86.79 30.00 45.83 72.31 42.86 64.00 72.59 25.00 20.00
A. Luna CF, LW, RW 9 8.13 46.34 61.11 48.84 40.00 1.39 32.31 88.41 40.74 66.30 80.95 52.50 77.78 85.38 33.33 38.46
E. Justine CF, LW, RW 6 14.42 34.48 62.50 37.29 40.00 3.98 18.40 100.00 40.00 50.00 80.00 0.00 85.71 80.00 0.00 0.00
F. Černych CF 9 5.22 44.44 52.63 42.28 44.74 2.75 23.91 96.55 21.43 58.70 72.92 28.57 83.33 80.82 0.00 0.00
I. Pandita CF 15 11.32 29.51 50.00 33.64 42.86 3.15 13.55 87.10 33.33 30.77 62.50 100.00 20.00 71.01 0.00 0.00
N. Sudheesh CF, RW 8 7.88 7.69 20.00 26.15 27.27 2.12 14.24 87.50 33.33 50.00 53.33 0.00 28.57 72.50 0.00 0.00
K. Thingujam RW 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
D. Diamantakos CF 17 11.08 43.72 68.09 40.63 36.67 3.27 17.79 92.63 25.00 54.55 77.22 18.18 78.57 77.86 12.50 12.50
R. Kannoly Praveen RW 18 6.15 28.57 48.39 36.89 39.13 2.37 26.54 93.51 21.74 59.09 77.11 50.00 71.88 81.58 25.00 28.57

K. Peprah (CF):

  • Kwame engaged in approximately 12.55 offensive duels per game, winning 37.14% of them:
    • Successful dribble rate: 57.50%, indicating effective opponent take-ons.
    • Comparable to high-performing players like Roy Krishna and Diego Mauricio:
      • Krishna and Mauricio averaged approximately 12 offensive duels per game with success rates of 36% and 38% respectively.
  • Peprah’s involvement in goal-scoring opportunities:
    • Number of touches in the box per game: 3.41.
    • Delivered 19.63 passes to the penalty area per game, showcasing creativity and vision in the final third.
    • Accurate back passes: 86.79%.
    • Accurate crosses: 30%.
  • Areas for improvement:
    • Clinical finishing in front of goal.
    • Players with similar or lower shots tally, such as T. Juric and Prathib Gogoi, had higher goal totals:
      • Juric: 16 shots, goal conversion rate of 31%.
      • Gogoi: 25 shots, goal conversion rate of 20%.

A. Luna (CF, LW, RW):

  • Adrian Luna’s passing game:
    • Among the best in the league with accurate short/medium passes at 85.38%.
    • Areas for improvement:
      • Low success rate in through passes (approximately 33%) and smart passes (approximately 38%).
      • Improving these can help break high defensive lines and allow strikers to get in behind in crucial matches, potentially increasing his assist tally.
  • Offensive actions:
    • High dribble success rate: 62%, making him one of the top dribblers in the league.
    • Offensive duels success percentage: 46.34%, with approximately 8 offensive duels per game.
    • Comparable players:
      • M. Molla: Success rate of 47% with 7.65 offensive duels per game.
      • T. Juric: Success rate of 46.67% with 8.23 offensive duels per game.
    • Potential improvement area:
      • Players like S. Vadakkepeedika from East Bengal have averaged approximately 10 offensive duels per game with a success rate of 62%.
      • Luna can improve his offensive duel success rate to enhance his output and chance creation.

E. Justine (CF, LW, RW):

  • Despite his lack of goals, Emmanuel Justine has shown extreme potential through his passing range:
    • 85.38% successful short/medium passes.
    • 66.30% successful forward passes.
    • 2 assists in 6 matches, surpassing his expected assist total of 0.29 assists.
    • Comparable players:
      • Sunil Chhetri (MP: 19, A: 3, xA: 0.46)
      • J. Cummings from Mohun Bagan (MP: 20, A: 2, xA: 1.17)
      • Note: Comparison players have played exponentially more matches.
  • Another highlight is his ability to carry the ball forward down the wings:
    • Successful dribble rate: 62.50%.
    • Area for improvement:
      • Offensive duel success rate: 34.48%.
      • Average of 15 offensive duels per game.
      • Needs to improve in taking on players.
  • Overall assessment:
    • Emmanuel Justine is a player of high potential with a promising start to his career at Kerala Blasters.

F. Černych (CF):

  • Area of improvement for Fedor Černych:
    • Average of 6 offensive duels per game with a success rate of 44.44%.
    • Comparison with similar players:
      • M. Singh from NorthEast United:
        • Played 9 matches, averaging 6 offensive duels per game.
        • Success rate: 38.1%.
      • I. Yadwad from Chennaiyin FC:
        • Played 16 games, averaging 6 offensive duels per game.
        • Success rate: 54.84%.
  • Performance this season:
    • Scored 2 goals (xG = 1.41) from 10 shots.
    • Goal conversion rate: 20% (considered low for an attacker).
    • Areas for improvement:
      • Enhance clinical output in front of goal.
      • Improve spatial awareness to get into scoring positions.

I. Pandita (CF):

  • Ishan’s offensive stats:
    • Average of approximately 12 offensive duels per 90 minutes.
    • Success rate: 29.51%.
    • Comparison with Carlos Martinez from Goa:
      • Played 21 games, averaged 11.21 offensive duels per game.
      • Success rate: 29.21%.
    • Successful dribble rate: 50%.
    • Potential for improvement:
      • Enhance ability to find gaps in opposition defense.
      • Has the potential to be a dangerous striker for Kerala upfront.

N. Sudheesh (CF, RW):

  • As a winger, Nihal Sudheesh’s performance stats:
    • Approximately 8 offensive duels per game.
    • Success rate: 7.69%.
    • Dribble success rate: 20%.
    • Area of improvement:
      • Bypass defenders to create more chances down the wings.
      • Enhance crossing opportunities for center forwards.
    • Comparison with players with minimum 5 offensive duels per 90:
      • Nihal Sudheesh has the lowest success rate.
      • Most comparable player: A. D’Silva (Hyderabad FC).
        • Matches Played: 6.
        • Offensive Duels/Game: 7.86.
        • Success Rate: 13.89%.
    • Passing stats:
      • Short/medium pass success rate: 72.50%.
      • In line with league and attacker averages.
    • Crossing success rate: 33.33%.
    • Potential area for improvement:
      • Enhance crossing accuracy to increase goal-scoring opportunities for strikers.
  • Overall offensive contribution from Nihal appears to be low.
    • Potential area of focus for the upcoming season.

K. Thingujam (RW):

Korou had a nice ease into the Kerala Blasters set up having only played 1 match and gaining an expected goal output of 0.02 goals highlighting the minimal number of chances he was offered in that match.

The data for this player is limited due to this and no further analysis could be obtained.

D. Diamantakos (CF):

  • Diamantakos’ offensive contributions:
    • Scored 2 goals (xG = 7.34).
    • Provided 2 assists (xA = 1.10).
    • Demonstrates high engagement in offensive plays.
  • Playing as a center forward:
    • Average offensive duels per game: 11.08.
    • Success rate: 43.72%.
    • Comparison with similar players:
      • L. Chhangte: 10.74 duels/game, 39.15% success rate.
      • S. Bhat (Mohun Bagan): 10.38 duels/game, 40% success rate.
    • Diamantakos has a higher offensive duel success rate.
  • Passing stats:
    • Success rate higher than league and position averages for all passing types except:
      • Crosses.
      • Long passes.
      • Forward passes.
    • Emphasizes importance of in-game contribution to goal creation.
  • Area for potential improvement:
    • Fouling ratio:
      • Approximately 2 fouls per game on average.
      • Accumulated 4 yellow cards and 1 red card this season.

R. Kannoly Praveen (RW): 

  • KP Rahul’s performance highlights:
    • Successful dribbling rate: ~50%.
    • Low offensive duel rate: 6.15 duels per game.
    • Offensive duel success rate: 28.57%.
    • Indicates tendency to find space behind defenders rather than taking them on.
  • Passing and playmaking:
    • High average passes to the penalty area: 26.54 per game.
    • Lateral passes success rate: 77.11%.
    • Comparable to A. Luna, who averages 32.31 passes to the penalty area per game.
  • Summary:
    • KP Rahul had a quiet season but showed high potential.
    • Strong passing range suggests capability to perform well in the next season.
4.2 Attacking Play
4.2.1 Goal Making
4.2.2 Play Making
4.3 Offensive Play
4.3.1 Offensive Duels
4.3.2 Duels & Dribbles
4.3.3 Passing
4.3.4 Penalty Area Actions

Conclusion

This season has been a compelling journey marked by significant highs and lows for Kerala Blasters FC. This season’s performance showcases a blend of tactical evolution, player development, and the challenges faced by the team, providing a comprehensive picture of the club’s current state and future potential.

Tactical and Strategic Insights 

Kerala Blasters FC’s tactical approach this season displayed a commendable blend of traditional defensive solidity and progressive attacking play. The introduction of a more flexible formation allowed for greater adaptability against varied opponents, showcasing the tactical acumen of the coaching staff. However, the inconsistency in execution often undermined the team’s efforts. While the defensive unit, led by key figures such as Marko Lešković and Miloš Drinčić, showed resilience, lapses in concentration and individual errors at critical moments led to the leakage of goals that proved costly in tight matches.

Player Performance and Development 

The individual performances this season were a mix of standout contributions and areas needing improvement. Emerging talents like Nihal Sudeesh displayed promising skill and potential, contributing significantly to the team’s offensive thrusts with crucial goals and assists. Veteran players such as Adrian Luna provided the necessary experience and stability, often stepping up during high-pressure situations. However, the team also struggled with injuries to key players, which disrupted the consistency of the starting XI and affected overall team cohesion.

Statistical Breakdown 

Analyzing the season’s statistics, Kerala Blasters FC showed a marked improvement in their attacking metrics compared to previous seasons. The increase in average possession percentage and successful pass completion rate indicates a shift towards a more possession-based style of play. Despite this, the conversion rate of chances created remained a concern, pointing to the need for a more clinical approach in the final third. Defensively, while the team maintained a respectable number of clean sheets, the goals conceded from set-pieces highlighted an area requiring focused attention.

Fan Engagement and Support 

The unwavering support of the Kerala Blasters FC fanbase continued to be a cornerstone of the club’s identity. The passionate backing, both at home and away matches, provided a significant morale boost for the players. This season saw several fan-driven initiatives and increased engagement through social media platforms, further solidifying the bond between the team and its supporters. The management’s efforts to enhance fan experience through various community and stadium activities also deserve commendation.

Challenges and Areas for Improvement 

The season was not without its challenges. The inconsistency in performance, particularly in away matches, highlighted a need for better mental fortitude and strategic planning. Additionally, the frequent injuries to key players underscored the necessity for improved medical and fitness protocols. The scouting and recruitment strategy also requires reassessment to ensure that the squad depth is sufficient to handle the rigors of a long season.

Looking Ahead 

Looking forward, Kerala Blasters FC has a solid foundation to build upon. The lessons learned from this season should inform a strategic approach to both player development and tactical refinement. Strengthening the squad depth, addressing the defensive vulnerabilities, and enhancing the attacking efficiency will be critical areas to focus on. With the right investments in player acquisitions and continued support from the fanbase, Kerala Blasters FC is well-positioned to make a stronger bid for the title in the upcoming seasons.

In conclusion, the 2023-24 season was a testament to Kerala Blasters FC’s resilience and potential. While there were moments of brilliance, the journey also highlighted the areas needing attention and improvement. With a strategic focus on addressing the identified gaps and leveraging the strengths, Kerala Blasters FC can look forward to a future of sustained success and potential glory in the Indian Super League.